readthenotes1 8 hours ago

"operatives" makes it sound like the chief executive has to spy on his employees.

mannyv 8 hours ago

I'd love to see the data they're getting. This might be the last time that anyone will be able to cross-reference financial data across the federal government.

justahuman74 8 hours ago

Do recruiting departments take note of things like this and put people on lists?

ranger_danger 9 hours ago

Why do multiple employees on this list have direct ties to Peter Thiel?

  • asteroidburger 7 hours ago

    Thiel himself has stayed out of the media, but a lot of what's happening is directly related to him. He's a big part of the reason we have JD Vance.

    I recently came across this article from July 2024. I'm not sure what to think of it - it feels a bit conspiracy-ish, but it explains a lot of what's happening now.

    https://washingtonspectator.org/peter-thiel-and-the-american...

  • the_third_wave 6 hours ago

    För the same reason that you'll find many operatives with links to e.g. George/Alex Soros in 'progressive' circles.

  • refurb 8 hours ago

    For the same reason the prior administration would have employees with direct ties to Biden associates?

    Because each administration hires their own people.

    • 1659447091 7 hours ago

      How is it Peter Thiel's administration though?

      Direct ties to Trump, okay, but the question was specifically about(pointing out) multiple direct ties to Peter Thiel.

      • lolinder an hour ago

        You misread their comment (emphasis added):

        > direct ties to Biden associates

        Biden hired people with ties to people in his circle. Trump does the same. That is not, in and of itself, nefarious—in private companies it's widely understood that hiring through your network is the most reliable way to hire.

        There may be other reasons why these particular cases are nefarious, but simply pointing out "ties to" does not show that by itself.